In what can only be described as the final, inevitable evolution of political discourse, Vice President Kamala Harris has officially compared Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler, signaling that we may have reached the bottom of the rhetorical barrel, where all political debates eventually collapse into the timeless “_________ is Hitler” phenomenon.
By: A Concerned Satirist
In a move that shocked absolutely no one, Vice President Kamala Harris, in a recent speech, escalated the time-honored art of political name-calling by labeling Donald Trump as “Hitler.” It seems we’ve reached the inevitable conclusion of internet debates where all roads, no matter how nuanced, now lead to the phrase, “Hitler 2.0.” According to several experts in online discourse, this may very well be the final stage of argument evolution.
“Comparing your opponent to Hitler is the nuclear option,” explains Dr. Sandra Godwin, a leading expert in online rhetoric and Godwin’s Law, a principle that states the longer an online discussion goes on, the likelihood of a comparison to Hitler approaches 1. “We used to see this kind of rhetoric only after long, drawn-out arguments when everyone was out of logical ammo, but it appears now people are skipping straight to Hitler. Why waste time?”
The practice, known by researchers as the “_________ is Hitler” phenomenon, has been growing exponentially since its internet debut in the late ’90s. It’s no longer just the territory of trolls or conspiracy theorists. In 2024, politicians, talking heads, and even your Aunt Karen have been seen wielding this weapon of mass debate as soon as discussions get heated.
“Back in the day, calling someone Hitler took effort,” reminisces Dr. Harold Memeworth, a historian specializing in hyperbolic comparisons. “You had to find some tenuous connection — like how they like dogs and guess who else liked dogs? Hitler! But now, no such creativity is required. It’s just ‘Trump = Hitler,’ case closed. It’s streamlined. Efficient. Like a Walmart of bad analogies.”
But while Harris’s recent verbal H-bomb may have been a crowd-pleaser for some, the decision to go full-Hitler has left many wondering: is there anywhere left to go from here?
Experts argue that there’s simply no comeback to a Hitler comparison. Dr. Godwin explains, “What can you even say to that? Once you’re Hitler, you’ve peaked in villainy. Are we going to compare someone to Satan next? Oh, wait, that’s already happened.”
Adding to this, political strategist Betty Smirkstein suggests that we are witnessing a collapse of sophisticated political debate. “We used to have genuine discussions about policies and ideologies. Now? Well, once Hitler enters the conversation, it’s over. It’s the conversational equivalent of flipping the Monopoly board when you’re losing.”
Still, some scholars believe this tactic may not have the same impact it once did. Professor Milo McTweeterson, an expert in digital outrage, thinks that the saturation of Hitler comparisons has left the public numb. “At this point, we’ve had so many Hitlers—every president for the last 20 years, plus at least three of my exes—that the label has lost all meaning. Maybe we should start getting creative again, you know? Call people Genghis Khan or Attila the Hun—shake things up a bit.”
In fact, the overuse of the Hitler accusation has led to the phenomenon’s biggest crisis: diminishing returns. “It’s like crying wolf,” McTweeterson continues. “Now, when someone is actually problematic, like, say, if they start growing a weird mustache and giving enthusiastic speeches about world domination, no one will believe you. They’ll just roll their eyes and say, ‘Oh great, another Hitler.’”
As Harris’s “Trump is Hitler” moment continues to dominate the headlines, one thing is clear: there’s nowhere left to go but down. Or sideways. Maybe backward. Online debate, like a poorly managed blender, has already mashed every logical argument into a smoothie of outrage and hyperbole. We’ve hit the bottom of the barrel, and the barrel is Hitler.
To conclude, it’s possible that this “Hitlerization” of political discourse may be the ultimate conversation-ender. As Dr. Godwin warns, “Once you’ve dropped the H-bomb, there’s no going back. We’ve hit rock-bottom… until someone inevitably calls the next candidate Mega-Hitler.”
Stay tuned for 2028, folks. It’s bound to get even worse.
Thank you for subscribing to the newsletter.
Oops. Something went wrong. Please try again later.
Read untrusted, non-award-winning journalism. Just a few dollars.
