In a stunning announcement that has set a new bar for cutting-edge journalism, Newsweek unveiled its revamped editorial guidelines, officially declaring that “X/Twitter, Reddit, and stuff we invent on the fly” will now serve as their primary sources of information.
By: The Fake News Corp Team
Published: Today, sometime around lunch
In a shocking yet unsurprising move, Newsweek has updated its journalistic standards to include some bold new policies. According to a leaked internal memo, the venerable publication will now rely exclusively on X (formerly Twitter), Reddit threads, and—when pressed for time—”some shit we make up” to fill in gaps where proper quotes or facts should go.
This radical shift has caused a minor stir among those still under the delusion that Newsweek is a serious news outlet. The memo allegedly reads: “Effective immediately, reporters no longer need to bother with sourcing from professionals, experts, or, you know, actual people. Our new approved sources include any random person with a Wi-Fi connection posting to Reddit, whoever’s angry on X at 3 a.m., and—if we’re in a pinch—whatever pops into your head after two cups of coffee. No need to fact-check. We trust your gut!”
Journalistic rigor at Newsweek has always been like a rubber band—flexible and prone to snapping at inconvenient moments—but this new strategy may set a new low. Reliable sources such as “anonymous Redditors,” “random dude on X with 14 followers,” and “our editor’s cousin Steve” will now be the foundation of every article.
“We are redefining news,” said an unnamed Newsweek employee, probably. “Truth is subjective, right? Sometimes it’s just about the vibe, you know?” Another source added, “Honestly, quoting actual experts takes too long. Finding a tweet that supports our headline? Way easier. Plus, if we can’t find anything, we’ll just invent a quote. No one really checks anymore!”
With this shift, Newsweek has reportedly declared X/Twitter as the “premier hub of truth.” The editorial team has issued guidance that “if it’s not trending on X, it’s probably not news.” Gone are the days of consulting scientists, political analysts, or even Wikipedia. Instead, X posts from @BigDawg420 and @CatLover69 will soon be gracing the footnotes of major international stories.
Newsweek journalists are expected to now start each day by scrolling their timelines and building stories based on the first conspiracy theory or hot take they see. Why verify when you can retweet?
Newsweek also announced a deeper partnership with Reddit. The editorial team clarified that user comments on any subreddit will now be acceptable sources, even ones that start with, “I’m not an expert, but…” or “I heard from a friend of a friend that…”
In a true stroke of genius, Newsweek has declared the conspiracy theory subreddit as their new science desk, while the “Am I the Asshole?” subreddit will serve as the moral compass for their opinion pieces.
When neither Reddit nor X can provide a half-decent quote, Newsweek has empowered its staff to simply fabricate content. One insider explained the reasoning: “I mean, we all do it anyway, so why not make it official? If you’re on a deadline and no one’s tweeted anything juicy, feel free to imagine what a source might say. Just make sure it sounds believable enough that readers won’t bother checking.”
This groundbreaking policy has already inspired several headline-worthy quotes such as:
Some actual journalists—yes, they still exist—have raised eyebrows at Newsweek‘s shift, calling it “a dumpster fire of credibility,” and “the final nail in the coffin of integrity.” However, many media analysts argue this was a natural progression. “Honestly, Newsweek’s been heading in this direction for years,” said an unnamed media expert, who we might’ve made up. “This just formalizes it.”
Meanwhile, an X user with a verified checkmark (which is totally official now that you can pay for it) posted, “Newsweek is just keeping it real. Who cares about facts when the vibes are immaculate?” This sentiment was echoed by Reddit user @NewsweekIsBae, who commented, “Honestly, I trust a good Reddit thread more than I trust most journalists. At least Redditors admit they’re making it up.”
As traditional news media grapples with the rise of misinformation, Newsweek has taken the bold step of leaning into it. They’ve embraced a brave new world where feelings are facts, likes are sources, and deadlines matter more than accuracy. After all, as one Newsweek editor probably said: “Who has time for truth when there’s a tweetstorm to chase?”
In the end, this might just be the future of journalism, and if it is, you can bet that we’ll cover it. Just don’t expect us to fact-check anything—because why bother?
Thank you for subscribing to the newsletter.
Oops. Something went wrong. Please try again later.
Read untrusted, non-award-winning journalism. Just a few dollars.
